If you look at the 'historical' part of Humankind as historical it is boring and awkward and inconsistent. Created by /u/Kryogenetics, it's a collage of some of the 4X genre's greatest games: Endless Legend, Civilization, Endless Space and Galactic Civilizations.Ĭompletely disagree.If you have any questions about the rules or need clarification please do not hesitate to message the moderators and ask!.Please do not post subsequent episodes or parts.
HUMANKIND REDDIT FREE
If you are a 4X developer, feel free to share and promote your game.Just don't resort to name calling and personal attacks. We understand there can be differences in opinions and that's okay. Keep discussion relevant to 4X Games, Companies, and Developers.
HUMANKIND REDDIT HOW TO
His ideas on how to reform are debatable, but he makes some compelling arguments against education.A subreddit for discussing 4X strategy games. It should be taken with some reserve, but overall the author is right. Finally The Case Against Education exposes how insane and ineffective out education system is. (Although, repetition is another effective way of learning, and that is why basic math operations is what we all know to do). Making kids sit obediently in classroom is the worst way to transfer knowledge. Neuroscientist Benedict Carey argues that the main function of play is learning. There is a chapter on this in Humankind, and Mathew Walker writes how just making kids get up in the morning is terrible for brain development. It is still based on the model for "educating" children to be obedient factory workers. There are lot of scientific work showing how our educational system is terrible for children cognitive abilities. Idk how it is not just apparent to anyone, after Covid, that schools are basically just huge babysitting operation so parents could go to work. When speaking of class we are referring to economic classes, power classes. >Also, humans naturally divide and once work is to be done, they may divide under any number of classes relating to jobs, personalities, ambitions, etc. Why? Because your oppressors tell you so? > It seems that any group of people eventually ends up with a system of laws and that inevitably will result in some kind of classes. Everyone involved participates, gets heard, gets taken into account. > How does the group maintain a balance whereby the entirety is willing to go along under the prescribed rules and decisions? Interesting book on this subject, debunking dogma: 'Humankind' They say "You're OK, everyone else is out to get you" With no basis. What makes you think such a thing is inherent? See, this is where the capitalists control you. >Aren't the inherent attributes of people problematic to this vision? People with solidarity have similar standards, morals. People with solidarity aren't that selfish.
What happens when any of the workers or groups of the workers decide to pursue their own interests at the expense of other groups?
0 kommentar(er)
